

Unreadable
A Solid Effort!
Smith's morality given the weight it deserves

Only wish it worked!
Auto-matically not automatically!I just begun to listen to this tape mid December and I do like it. You can listen to this tape while driving (the main reason I purchase it). I believe it's a play on words. Auto-matically does not mean that weight will come off automatically. I've read the back cover on another similar self-help tapes and they stress "DO NOT use their tapes while driving it can cause drousiness etc. This tape YOU CAN DRIVE and listen. Read the back cover and decide for yourself.
You must be open mined about how this tape works and they do stress that. They use affirmations (positive assertions) mostly throughout the tape. You may feel corny at first, (I do) repeating these affirmations to yourself, but maybe this IS what I/we need to "win the mental game of weight control. I know I can't achieve a better me soly by listening to this tape alone. In the short time of listening to this tape I can already see that mentally I'm more positive about wanting to improve myself. I've begun to re-read my ol' shelved fitness books and look for an exercise routine and ways to cook healthier meals. See it has helped me already.


This book is poorly researched and full of errors
The person who wrote the previous review is a FAKE!Chav

Terrible
If you use it - it worksIf you purchase and listen to this tape alot as back ground music, your conscous mind will learn to ignore the suggestions that most unimportant, while keying in on the pertinent suggestions. You will get benefit - besides it's guaranteed!
De-programming the "I forgot" or "I can't remember" attitudeThe audio tape is started with an introduction as to the purpose of the tape: To get you started in basic memorization, and attention focusing techniques. The "silly" background music during the affirmations is designed to trigger the right side of your brain, (as well as subconsciously help you to focus) so you can learn with your whole brain.
The tape will take you over the basics of the PEG memorization technique. (very effective in remembering lists) This tape will help you focus more clearly next time you talk to someone, or the next time you read a book you will be able to retain more information. It will help you remember names and long lists of things. IF you participate.
The memory is a "muscle" that needs excersize just like the rest of your body. I gave this 5 stars as it is the best introduction to basic list/name memorization techniques i have ever seen. The audio format provides a learning experience that no book can match.


Not Informative
Great Learning Tool!

The Los Angeles Barrio; a moderate book

Another Case of Greedy Publishers and Authors
Revised and Expanded?

CHEATED!!

us begin with the title, which is meaningless. The book is neither
about virtue nor the Enlightenment, except in the trivial sense
that Smith was an Enlightenment writer. Anyone picking up this book
to learn about the Enlightenment as a movement will be disappointed.
So Griswold appends a useless chapter on the Enlightenment to the
beginning of the book that promises a wide-ranging treatment of
the Enlightenment that rest of the book cannot deliver. (Perhaps
his editor, fearing that a book on Adam Smith's moral theory would
not reach a large audience, encouraged Griswold to broaden the appeal.
Too bad it didn't work). Griswold's book is, more accurately, a
treatment of Smith's neglected treatise A Theory of Moral Sentiments.
As such it is not a careful commentary on the content and structure
of the book, but instead a meandering tourist guide to the major
landmarks accompanied by a dull paraphrase of Smith's argument. Too make things worse, Griswold updates Smith's arguments
in the language of contemporary philosophy so that he can seem relevant
and prescient. This is strange coming from a quasi-Straussian, but
there you go. If that weren't bad enough, Griswold has a fussy,
collegial, and unhurried style, like a voluble visitor standing
in the doorway. As for the thrust or drift of Griswold's argument,
unfortunately I couldn't detect it. There are chapters on Smith
on love, skepticism, stoicism, religion, justice, passiona, etc.,
but the accumulation of detail doesn't add up to anything. The book
is also advertised as the first full-length treatment of Smith's
political and moral thought. That is wrong, but Griswold seems to
mistake that for an invitation to touch on every facet of Smith's
thought without regard for relevance. Griswold would have been better
served if he had been guided by the structure of Smith's own book
than by his own wandering attention. For Griswold, the 400-so
me pages of his book are one long opportunity to clear his throat. Get to the point!